A class-action lawsuit filed in Nevada federal court challenges IGT's popular Wheel of Fortune slot machines, claiming they deceive players through their bonus-wheel mechanics.

The lawsuit alleges that the game misleads players by presenting what appears to be a mechanical spinning wheel similar to roulette, implying equal winning chances for all segments. However, the outcome is predetermined by an internal computer programmed to favor lower-value segments.

Four former players filed the suit against IGT and casino operators including MGM Resorts, Bally's Corp, and Penn Entertainment. They argue that the game's association with the TV show reinforces false expectations about winning probabilities.

Key points about the lawsuit:

• Claims the game is equivalent to a rigged roulette wheel
• Seeks compensatory damages for all Wheel of Fortune players at defendant casinos
• Requests an injunction to stop the games' operation

How the games actually work:

• Uses a random number generator (RNG)
• Each wheel segment has different predetermined odds
• All players have equal chances of winning specific amounts
• Machines are programmed with specific return-to-player (RTP) percentages
• Gaming regulators approve all RNGs and game codes

The lawsuit faces significant challenges as Nevada gaming regulators have consistently approved these slot machines' mechanics, and state laws explicitly legalize and regulate slot operations through the Nevada Gaming Commission.

Related Articles

Previous Articles